Rdination and collaboration are deemed to be essential aspects within the
This might prove valuable for software project managers who have to cope with a distributed environment, assisting them choose between the variety of tools that are intended to PD325901 site assistance their activities. Study continues to be ongoing to uncover factors weighing in the failure of GSD projects. Two research conducted in 2016 (Niazi et al. 2016a, b) aim to determine challenges that may possibly undermine the achievement of such projects. These research have been carried out by the suggests of an SLR and have been validated applying information retrieved from questionnaire primarily based survey. Their final results indicate that GSD projects still endure from a lack of communication and coordination among stakeholders. Within this paper we report a systematic mapping study (SMS) around the tools made use of for SPM inside the context of GSD. Its purpose will be to determine these tools, to classify them using an international standard [ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207 "Systems Application Engineering--Software Lifecycle Process" (2008)] and to show how they support practitioners' activities. The information offered by this study includes a list of tools and their attributes, like: License form, technologies variety (framework, stand alone tool, plug-in. . .) and regardless of whether they foster communication, coordination and cooperation involving distinct stakeholders. This may possibly prove valuable for computer software project managers that have to handle a distributed atmosphere, helping them pick out involving the selection of tools that are intended to support their activities. Each tool builders and researchers also can determine prominent publication sources for relevant research and locations of SPM in which the least variety of tools is readily available, thus paving the way for the development of new tools. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: "Related work" section identifies associated perform regarding the subject in the SMS. "Mapping process" section presents the systematic mapping, which includes its arranging, conduction and analysis. In "Results and discussion" section, the outcomes and findings on the study are shown title= rsta.2014.0282 and discussed as well as the implications for researchers and practitioners are then described. "Threats to validity" section states the limitations of the evaluation. Finally, "Conclusions and future work" section presents title= eLife.06633 the conclusions of this SMS and feasible future function.Chadli et al. SpringerPlus (2016) 5:Web page 3 ofRelated perform Early investigation around the subject was conducted by da Silva et al. (2010) in an SLR carried out in 2010, in which researchers were able to list 24 tools intended for SPM use inside a hugely distributed atmosphere. The aim of this study was to identify the challenges confronted by project managers in this context, ideal practices that overcome these difficulties and both the tools and models that assistance these practices. An evidence-based project management improvement model was in the end presented. This model aims to provide practitioners and researchers with support as regards attaining a better understanding with the landscape of GSD project challenges and devise much more productive options to improve project management within a distributed setting. In the similar year, Portillo-Rodr uez et al. (2010) published a survey of 35 tools classified with the use on the processes presented in the ISO/IEC 12207 regular (2008). A matching title= fphar.2015.00210 between these tools, their functions as well as the distance issue they decrease was presented.